Recent Kaspersky, Norton’s “manslaughter” occasion in the Chinese IT industry CPE struggle between personal feelings related to antivirus software program, the improvement of China’s basic IT security, so order a bit to use their own objective feelings of anti-virus software program for everybody to do some thing a tiny reference:
Initial of all, the world’s leading five antivirus engines is that
1, the 1st course is to speak about Norton, and first true-time monitoring Technology , Also know that Microsoft’s code. Every person says that Norton is not excellent, in truth Norton is a effective engine. Protect your computer from the bottom, so operating is not also quickly, just distinct antivirus notion, so Norton is not only suitable for person customers. It is mainly to isolate the primary, to avert the business files are deleted. Because some virus-infected files can not entirely anti-virus. Will directly remove the damaged file, so Norton corporate users to pick the most suitable.
Norton’s antivirus software is not truly doing quite effectively to prevent the detection of several virus applications typically draw in the subroutine section of the code out collapse Norton, the new version of Norton can be used much more self-protection technologies . Norton’s engine ought to be fully self into a closed technique, no info has been confirmed Norton had to purchase or find out from other anti-virus engine. Rumors that numerous businesses are at the style reference leak version of Kaspersky engine style, it has been at Microsoft communities on the web chat, asked this query. Huitie agreed that the Norton anti-virus engine, Kaspersky draw unnecessary, its own engine Gaode fine. A single guy even named fenssa Huitie preclude consideration of aspects in the virus database, Norton’s antivirus engine is very advanced, integrated protective performance is great. Microsoft, in addition to the use of use of Norton Mcafee (which I am more convinced that rarely see the other Microsoft application becoming employed to kill). Norton’s technical documentation from the description and the spread of the 29A virus forum a guy referred to as out in a virtual machine atmosphere, the method of stepping up the work of Norton and anti-series of the passage, the Norton’s antivirus engine should be the traditional static code corresponds with the ideal mixture of genuine-time monitoring, there ought to be some improvements inside the virtual machine technology (Norton is not how men and women admired the virtual machine technology). Norton antivirus slow, Norton ought to be utilised from a lot more static code verify the standard way of the. I personally like Norton’s isolation Mechanism , I consider that there is no way to decide just before treatment completely appropriate, delete should not be utilized. An specialist must be able to write a virus related to the process as considerably as possible with the technique, in this case, the isolation of the benefit instantly apparent. Bigger footprint than Norton, but created to obtain the following objectives: to identify the virus and the virus has been identified as the procedure can properly handle on the function has not destroying the “virus body” does not create false positives, but not will appear again and once again finished with a virus, a virus was detected following the scenario.
Several folks feel that Norton Corporate Edition and person board is totally consistent with the engine, this understanding is not really proper. In fact Enterprise on your board have enhanced technically. Zdnet published an report pointed out: Enterprise Edition and Individual Edition core rules exactly the identical engine but in front of file to import part of the Enterprise Edition is better than the Personal Edition, and Enterprise API to use a lot more Interface . In the article, in the big-scale document scanning, the Enterprise version is better than private. And the use of a load technology, Enterprise resource usage a bit better. An additional is mentioned to support Enterprise-primarily based Network Multi-load approach.